문제 퀄 평가좀
게시글 주소: https://iu.orbi.kr/00068898278
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
아침에 일어날 떄부터 컨디션 이상하더니 헤롱헤롱하네요 아주
-
가능충 의미없눈거 알지만 문과 서울대 3월 더프 31111 4월더프 11111 5월...
-
6수하면 3
몸에서 육수 냄새 나기 시작하나요? 그래서 저는 5수까지만 할 생각입니다
-
얼리벌레기상 일찍 일어나는 벌레가 새한테 잡아먹힌다 그래서 늦게 일어난다
-
왜 다른 학과들은 한참 못 미치는데 저과들만 저럴가요? 저 과들이 하자가 있는건가요?
-
이거 이감 상상 파이널 걍 지금 미리 시키는게 낫나 3
원래 9월말에 시킬라했는데 갑자기 그때가서 판매종료됐다고 할까봐 쫄림 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
-
점심 골라줘 2
초밥 or 맘스터치 햄버거
-
실제로 충분한 거라기보다 그냥 자기 커리만 기준으로 얘기하니까 그런 거겠죠..?
-
며칠전에 하반기 패키지 추석 끝나고 주문해야지 이러고 오늘 다시 확인해봤는데...
-
행복하겠지만 너를 위해 기도할게
-
수능끝나고 연락해볼까 나 잘챙겨주셨는데
-
천 원 짜리는 진짜 듣도보도 못 했는데 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
-
실모 풀어봤는데 .. 시간 오래 걸리는 구간이 딱히 특정 단원이 아니고 돌아가면서...
-
글이 이상한건지 내가 이상한건지...
-
음? 2
아니 담배만 들고오고 라이터가 없음 뭔경우냐 이건 내. 핑크.라이타. ..
-
ㄹㅇ 제발...
-
생윤,윤사 둘다 1~2 왔다갔다하는 정도인데 풀만한 모의고사 추천부탁드립니다.그냥...
-
이건 작년꺼 올해는 1차합도 없고 면접도없음
-
설마 추석 끝나고 오나어
-
칸트 정언명령 얘기 대충 알고있었는데 선지에서 다털렷네
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ