Human intelligence has its own considerable strengths. The fundamental human limitation of having a relatively small brain, constrained by the energy and physical space available to it, ①has resulted in a lot of evolutionary “cleverness.” Human intelligence makes use of very effective pruning techniques that prevent the brain from running in overdrive, attempting to process billions of potential situations ②of which only one or two might be useful. The expense of this brute computational approach is simply not suited to biological beings. However, what is clear is that the availability of practically infinite mathematical ability, and abundant calculating speed, do result in discoveries ③that our biological brains have not yet made. We are “blindsided” to some degree by the biological imperative to conserve energy and make the best use of our brains, ④giving their physical limitations. In this way, machine thought, which can leverage incredible amounts of energy and space, ⑤is fundamentally different.

*pruning 가지치기, 불필요한 것을 잘라내기 **blindside 불시에 공격하다***leverage ~을 최대한 활용하다

29. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은?

Although modern medicine was founded in the 19th and 20th century as a science based on objective facts and experimental methods, one still doubts whether or not it is possible to describe health sufficiently in mere scientific categories. Obviously, our understanding of health and disease is not ①exclusively bound to the sphere of genes, molecules, proteins, cells, tissues and organs. There is no stamp on natural things which reveals ②them as “healthy” or “diseased.” It is the human ability to judge on current physical and psychical states ③bringing health and disease into being. We need scientific knowledge to develop efficient medical therapies — and we need reflection on the conceptual framework to clear the question, ④which of the physical and mental states are diseases. As a consequence of this peculiar relationship of descriptive and normative issues, our understanding of health clearly ⑤influences philosophical, cultural and historical conceptions (and misconceptions). *normative 규범적인, 기준을 세우는

팔로우 302

[ 기출의 파급효과 수학 ] 안정적인 수학 1등급, 빠르게 달성

[ 노크 ] 22개 대학합격인증자를 위한 안전하고 클린한 커뮤니티, 노크

[ P.I.R.A.M 수능 국어- 생각의 전개 2025 ]　결과로 증명한다. 올해도 피램!

0 XDK (+0)

유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.

영어교사 [684650]

쪽지 보내기

알림
스크랩
신고

라이넬 마리아 릴케 · 782480 · 19/11/08 19:59 · MS 2017

4벙 5벙

좋아요 0 답글 달기 신고
Lune37 · 909095 · 19/11/08 20:04 · MS 2019

4 5...?

좋아요 0 답글 달기 신고
젭알20학번 · 772060 · 19/11/08 20:08 · MS 2017

45

좋아요 0 답글 달기 신고
토요일 · 901347 · 19/11/08 21:16 · MS 2019

회원에 의해 삭제된 댓글입니다.

좋아요 0
Maggot · 893143 · 19/11/10 13:33 · MS 2019

4 given 5 influences
?

좋아요 0 답글 달기 신고
영어교사 · 684650 · 19/11/10 13:59 · MS 2016 (수정됨)

29번 선지 influence->influences로 정정합니다. 정답은 5번이 맞지만 influences가 아닌 is influenced by로 고쳐야 합니다.

좋아요 0 답글 달기 신고